Garbetts Newsletter

Service Company Confusion

The term "Service Company" is causing much confusion of late - most of which - maybe all - we can attribute to HMRC.

At law a "Service company" is not defined. Never has been.

Many years ago a "service company" was something which may be used by a lawyers, accountants, doctors, dentists and other professions denied corporate status to give them some of the advantages of corporate status. It was also a term used in the property world for a company managing a shared property, eg a block of flats.

In the last decade, with IR35 being the new kid on the block and, latterly, the MSC legislation, "service company" has taken on a new colloquial meaning aka "personal service company".

For some years the annual P35 employers return has had questions on it about IR35 / service companies.

This last year, HMRC have changed those questions and added some new ones onto individual Self Assessment returns as well.

P35 EMPLOYERS RETURN

2007-08 was the first year of operation for the new MSC (managed service company) rules, and its logical that HMRC need to police these.

The questions on P35 for 2007-08 were:

(i) “Are you a Service Company?” No/Yes

(ii) If 'Yes', have you operated the Intermediaries legislation (sometimes known as IR35) or the Managed Service Companies legislation? No / Yes
Two problems here. First, there is no legal definition of service company. How can you be a service company if there is no definition in law of one? In practice we know what they mean, and there is a definition of sorts in HMRCs payroll manuals, but thats no substitute for properly drafted rules and questions. Put that another way, ask a silly question, get a silly answer.

The second problem, have you operated the legislation? Well, the answer could be yes regardless. Take IR35 as an example; basically the legalisation is in three parts - first it frames those who it potentially applies to, secondly it sets out (badly) the criteria for the deemed salary applying and, thirdly it sets out the calculation of the deemed salary. Now suppose you have had a contract review, considered your status, taken advice, and decided that the IR35 deemed salary rules don't apply to you - if so have you operated the legislation or not? Well, you've certainly operated the first and second part, and the answer to the second part was you didn't need to go on to part three. So, "Yes" or "No". Well, we know what HMRC were really asking - about part three - but, again, they didn't ask it properly. SO you can easily answer "Yes" I operated the legislation in the correct manner for someone it doesn't apply to.

HMRC have, belatedly, realised the folly of their ways. In a recent update they have indicated they are going to ignore the answers to these questions for the purposes of rick profiling this tax year (although one may argue if you believe that, you'll believe anything).

The conclusion here is that HMRC are fishing for infomration about those whom IR35 or the MSC legilsation applies to. Although some of HMRCs questions are badly worded, the net is closing - there is no way aroound this legilsation, just a way through it, which is making sure you work in a IR35 complient manner (and thats much more than just a fancy contract - its the working practices on a day to day basis that carry weight). Fancy contracts, fancy tax schemes - be they MSCs, offshore, EBTs, or whatever - don't succeed.

SELF ASSESSMENT RETURN

Moving on to the 207-08 Self Assessment return, we have a new question as follows:

"Total amount of income included anywhere on this Tax Return, derived from the provision of your services through a service company"

The tax return guide published by HMRC expands on this:

"You should complete this box if you have received any form of income (including employment income and dividends) during the year in question from a company through which you provided your services personally and of which you are a sole or joint shareholder.

"Complete this box if the company’s income is derived:

• wholly or mainly from services provided to third parties by you personally, or
• wholly or mainly from services provided to third parties by you personally and
your fellow shareholders and your shareholding is directly linked to the level of
company profit you generate (that is, linked to the amount paid by third parties
in respect of your personal services).

"Do not complete this box if you are a shareholder and company officer of a company and the company’s income is derived wholly or mainly from the provision of the services of company employees whose total income is treated as employment income, or derived wholly or mainly from the manufacture/provision of goods.

"Example

"Employment income (box 1 on the Employment page)
all received from the company £15,000
Dividends from UK companies (box 3 on page TR 3) of
which £50,000 was received from the service company
and £5,000 from a shares portfolio = £55,000
Total £70,000
Amount to be entered (excluding shares portfolio) in the
the service companies box, box 1 on page TR 4 £65,000"

This question is much wider than the P35 questions for IR35 / MSC and as much as it applies to "traditional" target areas, eg freelanceers in engineering, IT, and similar, it could apply to anyone (i) operating a company and (ii) not emplying others - a accountant, a graphic designer, a plumber and so on.

So HMRC are looking at something different here - almost certainly trying to root out those where the Income Shifting legislation may apply. You will probably recall that the Income Shifting legilsation (son of S660a) was meant to take effect this April, but its now been deferred for 12 months.

Again similar problems apply to the P35 - a service company isn't defined in law for starters. More sigifincantly the quesions are subective - how much assistance do you need before you cease to supply services "wholly or mainly" by you perosnally - one part time assistant, one full time assistant, one part time fee earner? Wheres the line.

Similar comments apply though to those about the P35 - the net is closing. It looks like the Income Shifting legislation will apply in one form or another from April 2009 onwards, and its only to be expected that HMRC will seek to taret their enquiry resources into the direction where they feel they can have most impact.

Back to top

		Summer Hours
	A quick reminder that our office is on summer hours now - that means we close at 1pm on a Friday between now and the end of October. Back to top

		Phased Retirement
	When the retirement age was first set at 65, nobody expected us to live as long as we are living now. For many who have not been able to save enough during their working lives, it will mean working harder and maybe longer. For some people, the flexibility of phased retirement may help the transition. Phased retirement can also be useful for people who wish to ‘wind down’ from their business commitments. Perhaps you would like to stay involved but work less hours and supplement your reduced income with a slice of your pension. Phased retirement can be seen as a series of mini-retirements. Basically, your pension is split into lots of smaller identical pensions and rather than retiring all of them on the same day, you take just a few at a time over a period of years. Therefore, at initial retirement, you could take a mini tax free lump sum, plus a mini-annuity, using up just part of your overall fund. You leave the rest invested and then take more at fixed dates in future or as your needs change. Finally, you convert any remaining part of your retirement fund to an annuity at age 75. The advantages of phasing can include the potential for further growth on the money left invested. Also, annuity rates generally improve as you get older, so later retirements should buy more income than earlier ones. However, there are also risks to consider. The money remaining invested may fall in value if markets turn down - or annuity rates may fall if actuaries decide we are living even longer. In addition, you may not be able to access your entire tax free lump sum until your entire pension is taken. Finally, there are charges involved which can eat into your fund. However, you only retire once so you need to make sure you consider every option. For more information please call your Garbetts Financial Strategies Adviser on 01983 527111. www.garbetts.com/gfs Back to top


	DISCLAIMER - PLEASE NOTE: The ideas shared with you in this email are intended to inform rather than advise. Taxpayers circumstances do vary and if you feel that tax strategies we have outlined may be beneficial it is important that you contact us before implementation. If you do or do not take action as a result of reading this newsletter, before receiving our written endorsement, we will accept no responsibility for any financial loss incurred.